Watch the full event
With debt crises unfolding all over the world, a new effort is underway to deploy technology to improve lending to developing countries.
The project, announced Tuesday by Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub head Cecilia Skingsley at an Atlantic Council conference, will bring together the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and BIS in an effort to “tokenize”—or apply blockchain technology to—World Bank development aid. The aim is for the technology to help speed up cross-border settlements and make development aid safer, protecting secure information.
The project may also make it easier to guarantee that the aid is fully compliant with regulations against money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
“Will [it] save a lot of money? Will it revolutionize the world? No, probably not,” Skingsley said at the conference on central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) hosted by the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center. “But I think it’s a very tangible way to actually put the technology to work.”
Below are more highlights from the conversation, moderated by Alice Fulwood of the Economist, which touched upon shaping the financial system for the public interest and rebutting arguments against CBDCs.
Meeting new demand
- Skingsley explained that global technological progress has increased the appetite for cross-border financial transactions that settle instantly, a solution offered by CBDCs. “It’s critical to get the right infrastructures in place” to facilitate that, she explained.
- With technological change happening “so fast,” driven largely by the private sector, central banks “need to pay attention,” Skingsley argued.
- “There are many technological ideas out there that have… potential,” she added. “If this is left unchecked, these technologies may develop into services used in our societies in a way that may not have the public interest as the first priority.”
- Designing a financial system for a digitized future will require grappling with questions around the protection of privacy, financial stability, geopolitics, and financial inclusion, Skingsley added. She also said that a new financial system should protect people’s right to choose how they spend money. “Cash should continue to play a role. People should have the option to use it if they want,” she argued.
Defying the doubters
- Skingsley pointed to the criticism that retail CBDCs—intended for use by households or companies—designed for domestic use don’t address any immediate needs, as they don’t tackle cross-border payments. But “if we dismiss CBDCs,” she argued, “we might be foregoing opportunities to improve the previous public good, which is money; and we could miss opportunities to provide better and cheaper services to people.”
- In response to those who argue that CBDCs present a threat to privacy and a risk that a country could institute social controls, Skingsley explained that privacy is “not something that we have that comes by chance” and that most countries already have legal protections in place that would cover financial privacy. “These mechanisms,” she said, “should be preserved.”
- She also noted that because privacy relates to the development and strength of democratic institutions, government officials—beyond central banks—should help ensure strong privacy regulations around CBDCs.
- When CBDC skeptics argue that the currency presents a risk to financial stability, Skingsley said she replies that the “train has already left the station” as digital bank runs already happen. She also argued that CBDCs wouldn’t make the problem worse, as—according to central banks—countries have the tools to counter bank runs.
Setting the standards
- Skingsley said that other, private-sector-led crypto projects are a “sort of wake-up call” that central banks cannot “just sit on their hands” anymore. “But that is not necessarily the same thing [as] to say that we need to rush things,” she said, adding that she thinks many countries are exploring CBDCs “at a good pace” and the paces of their transitions should vary.
- Looking back on many other historical innovations, she noted that the private sector led first, and then the public sector stepped in with needed laws, regulations, and foundations. “We need to think about the regulations and the international standards,” she argued.
- The Swedish banker put these efforts into three categories: The first is principles for financial market infrastructures; she explained there are already such legal and regulatory standards in place through the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Action Task Force.
- But moving forward, Skingsley added, countries should work together on two other categories: Setting standards related to payment-specific technologies—and how to operate them—as well as establishing cross-cutting technology standards.
- “It’s a really collective responsibility to make sure technology ultimately [serves] economically meaningful activities,” Skingsley concluded.
Katherine Walla is an associate director of editorial at the Atlantic Council.