These 2 Cryptocurrencies Have Better Outlooks Than Solana or Ethereum. Should You Buy Them?

When you own a stock and the business behind your shares makes money, you usually see some of it kicked back your way, whether as a direct transfer of money like with a dividend, a buyback of shares that lifts the price of what you still own, or a reinvestment that increases the value of the company on a longer timetable.

But when you hold a cryptocurrency like Solana or Ethereum, the relationship is almost always one-way, as there’s rarely any mechanism by which the network’s activity or on-chain value gets translated into price appreciation or a payout of any kind. That also makes it hard to be enthusiastic about their development roadmaps as a holder, since the reinvestment into platform technology offers no clear way to reward you.

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Contrary to that, the common dynamic is that two smaller cryptos are building something closer to the corporate playbook. There’s Hyperliquid (CRYPTO: HYPE), which routes nearly all of its trading revenue into open-market buybacks of its own token, and Zcash (CRYPTO: ZEC), which hands a fifth of every newly issued coin to the developers in its ecosystem.

As an investor, that makes the outlooks for those two coins a lot easier to believe in — but should you buy either of them?


Image source: Getty Images.

The buyback machine that pays on every trade

Hyperliquid runs a decentralized crypto exchange for a type of financial derivative called perpetual futures. It automatically captures 99% of the trading fees paid by users of its exchange and uses the proceeds to buy its native token, Hype, on the open market, removing those tokens from circulation, just like a stock buyback.

Hyperliquid’s cumulative buybacks crossed $1.3 billion in mid-May 2026, which, on an annualized basis, would mean buying back nearly 7% of Hype’s market cap. For comparison, that’s several times Ethereum’s token burn rate from transactions and many times Solana’s burn rate, so the relationship between Hyperliquid’s network activity and holder returns is far more palpable.

What’s more, this single mechanic reframes the issue of what actually makes a token valuable more clearly than most token whitepapers manage; Hype is valuable because it’s currently a net-deflationary asset that constantly re-creates its own conditions of scarcity, so long as traders continue to use its platform.